AI created, human edited.

Samsung's latest Galaxy Unpacked event brought many new devices but left some wondering if the tech giant is running out of innovative steam. On Tech News Weekly, host Mikah Sargent and guest Jason Howell broke down the announcements, highlighting incremental updates and design choices that draw heavy inspiration from Apple.

The Z Fold 6 and Z Flip 6 headline Samsung's foldable lineup, but this year's updates are primarily iterative. Both devices now cost $100 more than their predecessors, a move that may be hard to justify for many consumers. While the Z Fold 6 boasts a slightly wider front cover and some minor design tweaks, Howell noted that it's becoming "harder in their foldable lineup to make the case that you have to upgrade to this next one."

Samsung's new wearables raised eyebrows with their striking resemblance to Apple products. The Galaxy Watch Ultra, with its rugged titanium design and orange accents, bears a strong similarity to the Apple Watch Ultra. Similarly, the new Galaxy Buds 3 and Buds 3 Pro features stems reminiscent of AirPods, departing from Samsung's previous "bean" design.

Howell speculated on the reasons behind these design shifts, wondering if the stem on the earbuds provides more surface area for touch controls or improves microphone placement. However, given their questionable utility and potential battery drain, he also questioned the necessity of the LED lights running down each earbud stem.

Perhaps the most intriguing announcement was Samsung's entry into the smart ring market, the Galaxy Ring. Priced at $399, it offers health tracking features similar to the Oura Ring but without a subscription fee. However, its compatibility is limited to Galaxy smartphones, potentially limiting its appeal.

Howell expressed interest in the Ring's sleep-tracking capabilities, noting that it could be more comfortable than wearing a watch to bed. However, he also acknowledged that the high price might be a barrier for many consumers.

While artificial intelligence features were mentioned throughout the presentation, Howell noted that they didn't seem to offer any groundbreaking capabilities compared to what's already available on other devices. The event also hinted at an upcoming XR (extended reality) platform developed in partnership with Google, though details remain scarce.

Samsung's latest Galaxy lineup shows the company making safe if somewhat derivative, choices in design and features. While the new devices offer incremental improvements, the higher price points and familiar aesthetics may leave some consumers questioning the value proposition. As the smart device market matures, whether Samsung can recapture its reputation for cutting-edge innovation in future releases remains to be seen.

Subscribe to Tech News Weekly on your favorite podcast player, and join Club TWiT for even more tech coverage!

Created by AI, edited by humans.

In the latest episode of Untitled Linux Show, hosts Jonathan Bennett, Jeff Massie, Rob Campbell, and David Ruggles dive deep into the exciting developments in the Linux ecosystem. From gaming advancements to security vulnerabilities and hardware updates, there's something for every Linux enthusiast. Here are just a few actionable tips and tricks from the episode that you can benefit from.

1. Linux Gaming Surge:

The gaming landscape on Linux is witnessing a significant transformation. According to the latest Steam survey, Linux has surpassed the 2% threshold in the gaming market share, overtaking macOS. This surge is attributed to the success of the Steam Deck and growing dissatisfaction with Microsoft's recent decisions. Additionally, StatCounter statistics suggest that when including Chrome OS, Linux's desktop market share could be around 6%.

• Tips:
  • Participate in the Steam Survey: If you're a Linux gamer, make sure to participate in the Steam survey. This helps to maintain and increase Linux's market share, which in turn encourages more developers to support Linux.
  • Try the Steam Deck: If you haven't yet, consider trying out the Steam Deck. Its popularity is one of the driving forces behind the growth of Linux gaming.

2. OpenSSH Vulnerability:

Security is always a crucial concern, and the episode highlights a significant vulnerability in OpenSSH. Introduced in version 8.5 P1 and fixed in version 9.8 P1, this flaw can allow attackers to execute arbitrary code on your server after about five to six hours of continuous hammering.

• Tips:
  • Update Immediately: Ensure you're running the latest version of OpenSSH. If you're on Debian 12 or a RHEL 9 derivative, this is particularly crucial.
  • Restart SSHD: After updating, either restart the SSHD daemon or reboot your machine to apply the changes.
  • Use Fail2ban: Tools like fail2ban can help mitigate risks by banning IPs that show malicious signs, although they are not foolproof.

3. New Features in Wine 9.12:

Wine 9.12 has introduced several updates that enhance Windows application compatibility on Linux. Notably, there's initial support for user 32 data structures in shared memory and a complete rewrite of the cmd.exe engine.

• Tips:
  • Update to Wine 9.12: If you rely on Wine for running Windows applications, update to the latest version to take advantage of these improvements.
  • Check Bug Fixes: Specific bugs, including those affecting Firefox 126, have been resolved. Keep Wine up to date to ensure your applications run smoothly.

4. Fedora Spyware Concerns:

Finally, concerns about potential spyware in Fedora are addressed, urging users to stay vigilant and informed.

• Tips:
  • Stay Updated: Regularly update your system to protect against vulnerabilities and spyware.
  • Review Software Sources: Be cautious about the software and repositories you add to your system. Stick to official and trusted sources whenever possible.

Want to hear more in-depth discussions and Linux tips? Join Club TWiT and listen to the full episode of Untitled Linux Show for additional insights and entertaining banter from Jonathan, Jeff, Rob, and David!

Created by AI, edited by humans.

In a surprising turn of events, OpenAI parted ways with Microsoft and Apple regarding their board seats. This development, discussed in depth on a recent episode of Windows Weekly, has sent ripples through the tech industry and raised questions about the future of AI partnerships and oversight.

Paul Thurrott, a longtime tech journalist and Windows expert, pointed out the peculiar timing of this decision. A week prior, Apple had secured a non-voting "observer seat" on OpenAI's board without any significant financial investment. This move mirrored Microsoft's position, which they obtained after a substantial $13 billion investment in the AI company.

The hosts speculated on the reasons behind this sudden change. Thurrott noted that regulatory bodies, including the EU, UK CMA, and US government agencies, had previously announced investigations into the Microsoft-OpenAI relationship. The concern was that their partnership might be structured to avoid antitrust scrutiny from an outright acquisition.

Thurrott mentioned that the EU had recently cleared the Microsoft-OpenAI partnership, stating it didn't break any laws. This makes the timing of OpenAI's decision even more intriguing.

Richard Campbell, co-host of the podcast and fellow Microsoft expert, suggested that the move might be linked to a potential restructuring of OpenAI. He pointed out that the company has been publishing revenue numbers despite being privately held, which could indicate positioning for a future public offering or significant structural changes.

The discussion also touched on OpenAI's changing nature. Campbell noted that many original AI researchers who joined OpenAI to work in the public interest have since left to start their own AI companies. This departure might pressure OpenAI to restructure in a way that allows for better talent retention through stock options and other financial incentives.

Thurrott and Campbell emphasized the rapid pace of AI development and its impact on the tech industry. They compared the current AI boom to other transformative moments in Silicon Valley history, noting that the speed of AI's advancement is unprecedented.

The hosts also speculated on the potential for collusion among big tech companies, given that Microsoft and Apple - two of the world's largest companies - had secured these observer seats. While acknowledging that such collusion would be challenging to prove, they raised questions about the concentration of influence in the AI sector.

Much of what's happening behind the scenes at OpenAI remains a mystery. This shake-up in the OpenAI boardroom highlights the complex interplay between technological advancement, corporate strategy, and regulatory oversight in the rapidly evolving AI landscape. As the situation continues to develop, it's clear that the implications for the future of AI governance and industry partnerships will be significant.

Be sure to listen to the complete episode of Windows Weekly to hear the full discussion and more in-depth analysis. The hosts' expertise and insider perspectives provide valuable insights into this developing story and its potential impact on the tech industry.

Subscribe to Club TWiT for even more tech coverage!

AI written, human edited.

In a recent episode of Security Now, hosts Steve Gibson and Leo Laporte dug into the shocking decline of Entrust, one of the oldest certificate authorities (CAs) in the industry. The discussion painted a picture of a once-respected company brought low by what appears to be a toxic mix of arrogance, mismanagement, and the influence of private equity ownership.

Gibson walked listeners through the events leading up to Google's announcement that Chrome would no longer trust Entrust's certificates after October 31, 2024. This decision effectively signals the end of Entrust's certificate business, as Chrome's market dominance means other browsers are likely to follow suit.

The hosts emphasized several key points:

1. A Pattern of Non-Compliance: Entrust had repeatedly failed to adhere to industry standards and best practices over several years. This included missing required fields in certificates, failing to revoke misissued certificates in a timely manner, and ignoring community concerns.

2. Arrogance in the Face of Scrutiny: When confronted by the CA/Browser Forum community about these issues, Entrust's responses were described as dismissive and evasive. The company seemed to believe it was above the rules that govern the industry.

3. The Role of Private Equity: Both hosts speculated on whether Entrust's 2009 acquisition by private equity firm Thoma Bravo might have contributed to the decline in standards. Laporte drew parallels to other companies that have suffered after private equity takeovers.

4. The Importance of Public Trust: Gibson and Laporte stressed that being a CA is not just a business, but a public trust. Entrust's apparent prioritization of profits over security responsibilities was seen as a fundamental breach of this trust.

5. Industry Self-Regulation: The episode highlighted the CA/Browser Forum's role in setting and enforcing standards. The community's patience and multiple attempts to bring Entrust into compliance were noted, as was the ultimate necessity of Google's action.

6. Technical Specifics: Gibson detailed some of the technical violations, such as missing CPS URIs in EV certificates and failures to meet the 120-hour revocation deadline for misissued certificates.

The hosts concluded that Entrust's downfall serves as a stark warning to other CAs and tech companies holding positions of trust. Laporte summed it up succinctly: "This is what happens when people who only run businesses don't understand the difference between a business, a profit-seeking enterprise, and a public trust."

As the industry moves forward, the Entrust case will likely serve as a cautionary tale about the critical importance of maintaining trust, following agreed-upon standards, and understanding the unique responsibilities that come with being a cornerstone of internet security infrastructure.

For those relying on Entrust certificates, the message is clear: start planning to switch providers before the October 31, 2024 deadline. The wider tech community will be watching closely to see how this shakeup affects the CA landscape and whether it leads to improved practices across the industry.

Subscribe to Club TWiT for even more tech news!

AI created, human edited.

In the latest episode of the Ask The Tech Guys podcast, hosts Leo Laporte and Mikah Sargent tackled a topic near and dear to every computer user: backing up their precious data. The discussion was sparked by viewer Martin in Quebec, who sought advice on replacing his trusty Drobo device, which safeguards eight family computers.

The Death of Drobo

Martin's dilemma will feel familiar to many: that sinking feeling when a once-reliable backup solution goes belly up. In this case, the Drobo, a long-time favorite of Leo's, unfortunately met its demise when the company behind it went under. The challenge now? Finding a robust replacement to protect the digital lives of Martin's entire family.

The Holy Backup Trinity: NAS, Cloud, and SSD

Leo and Mikah wasted no time researching the top contenders for Drobo's throne. They recommend a three-pronged approach combining network-attached storage (NAS), cloud backup, and high-capacity external SSDs.

For the NAS option, the Tech Guys sang the praises of Synology devices, which offer ample storage and handy features like built-in Plex media server capabilities. The upfront cost may be higher than a simple external drive, but the peace of mind is priceless.

Cloud backup services like Backblaze also earned high marks for their simplicity and reliability. With a set-it-and-forget-it model, Backblaze continuously protects your data in the background, making it an ideal choice for the less tech-savvy members of Martin's family.

We're rounding out the trifecta with high-capacity external SSDs, like those from Other World Computing. While not as feature-rich as a NAS or as effortless as the cloud, these drives offer speedy performance and easy portability for on-the-go backups.

The 3-2-1 Backup Rule

To tie it all together, Leo and Mikah emphasized the importance of following the 3-2-1 backup rule: keep at least three copies of your data on two different storage types, with one copy kept off-site. This approach ensures multiple avenues to recover your irreplaceable files, even if disaster strikes.

Leo wisely noted, "You can never have too many backups." By combining the strengths of NAS, cloud, and SSD solutions, you can create a near-bulletproof plan to safeguard your digital life.

College-bound with Peace of Mind

The backup wisdom didn't stop with Martin's plight. Jeremy from California chimed in, seeking guidance on protecting his daughter's data as she heads off to college with a shiny new MacBook. The ever-helpful Tech Guys duo suggested a two-pronged plan: use the Mac's built-in Time Machine software to back up to an external drive and supplement with a cloud service like Backblaze for off-site protection.

For added convenience, they recommended setting up a docking station in the dorm room. This would allow Jeremy's daughter to effortlessly connect to a larger monitor, keyboard, mouse, and, of course, her backup drive. With this setup, she can work (and procrastinate) in comfort while Time Machine quietly works its magic in the background.

The Bottom Line

In a world where our lives are increasingly digital, a solid backup strategy is no longer a luxury - it's a necessity. As Ask The Tech Guys so aptly demonstrated, there's no one-size-fits-all solution. By combining the strengths of NAS, cloud, and external drives, you can create a personalized plan that fits your needs, budget, and technical know-how.

Because let's face it: the only thing worse than a failed hard drive is the sinking realization that your last backup was months (or years) ago. Don't let that happen to you - take a cue from Leo and Mikah and get your backup ducks in a row today.

Catch the full episode of Ask The Tech Guys for more tech wit and wisdom. In addition to backup brilliance, you'll hear about the latest AI controversies, Apple Podcasts on Google speakers, travel hacks from Johnny Jet, and so much more. Trust us - your brain (and your data) will thank you.

Subscribe And Never Miss an Episode!

Apple's New Whitepaper

On this week's MacBreak Weekly, Leo Laporte, Andy Ihnatko, Alex Lindsay, and Jason Snell dive into Apple's latest whitepaper on designing products for durability and repairability. They also discuss the European Competition Commissioner's claim that Apple is showing anticompetitive behavior by withholding its AI system in Europe, critical flaws in CocoaPods exposing iOS and macOS apps to supply chain attacks, and the growth of Apple TV+ in the US, now surpassing Paramount+.
Watch now

Maximize Your Impact

Advertise with TWiT and take your brand to the next level! Our advertising solutions connect you with a tech-savvy, engaged audience, maximizing your reach with personalized campaigns. Explore advertising options

Google's AI Progress

This week on TWiG, Leo Laporte, Jeff Jarvis, Paris Martineau, and Cathy Gellis explore the environmental costs of Google's AI advancements. The Supreme Court's rulings on content moderation cases and age verification laws also take center stage, shedding light on First Amendment protections and the implications of recent judicial decisions.
Watch now

Help Us Grow Our Podcast Community! Your support is crucial in expanding our podcast community. Engage with our episodes, share with friends, and become a part of our growing network. Every bit of support counts in bringing you more of the content you love.

You can get this newsletter in your inbox and follow our tweets and skeets for more updates.

Facebook

X

Instagram

Bluesky

YouTube

LinkedIn

twit.tv

In the ever-evolving landscape of online security, passkeys have emerged as a promising solution to our password woes. But as Paul Thurrott recently explored on the Hands-On Windows podcast, the implementation of passkeys for Microsoft accounts is still very much a work in progress.

Passkeys are designed to be a more secure, passwordless way to authenticate your online accounts. The key principle is that they're tied to the specific device you're using, leveraging built-in security features like Windows Hello or Apple's Face ID. This approach aims to eliminate the vulnerabilities associated with traditional passwords.

While Paul Thurrott's experience suggests that passkey support for Microsoft accounts is still not ideal, some users may still want to experiment with this feature.

Here's how to set it up:

1. Go to account.microsoft.com and sign in to your Microsoft account.
2. Navigate to the Security dashboard.
3. Look for the "Manage how you sign in" section.
4. Click on "Add a new way to sign in or verify."
5. Here's where it gets tricky: Instead of a clear "Passkey" option, select "Email code."
6. You'll be presented with options to save the passkey. Currently, Microsoft offers two choices:
   1. Your phone (iPhone, iPad, or Android device)
   2. A security key
7. If choosing your phone, a QR code will appear. Scan this with your phone's camera.
8. You'll then be prompted to create a passkey on your phone. This may involve using your device's built-in security features (like Face ID on an iPhone) or a third-party password manager if you have one installed.
9. After confirming on your phone, return to your computer and click "OK."
10. You'll be asked to name your passkey. Choose a name that helps you remember which device it's associated with.
11. Click "OK" to finish the setup.

Important Notes:

• As of now, Microsoft doesn't offer an option to save the passkey directly to your Windows PC, which is a significant limitation.
• After setup, you may find that you can't actually use this passkey to sign in on your Windows PC, as Paul experienced in the podcast.
• The usefulness of this passkey may vary depending on the devices and apps you use to access your Microsoft account.

Want to dive deeper into the world of Microsoft account security? Be sure to listen to the full episode of Hands-On Windows with Paul Thurrott. You can find it and more great tech content by subscribing to Club TWiT!

In the ever-evolving world of television technology, understanding the nuances between different display types can be crucial when purchasing. In a recent episode of Home Theater Geeks, host Scott Wilkinson delved deep into the fascinating realm of TV brightness and color quality, comparing LED, QLED, and OLED technologies. Let's break down the key points to help you navigate this colorful landscape.

The Basics: LED vs OLED

At the core of the discussion lies the fundamental difference between LED (which are actually LCD TVs with LED backlights) and OLED displays. While LED TVs use a backlight to illuminate pixels, OLED TVs employ organic materials that emit light directly. This distinction is crucial in how each technology handles color and brightness.

Color Depth and Richness

One of the standout advantages of OLED technology is its ability to produce deeper blacks and richer colors. Because each pixel in an OLED display can be turned off completely, it achieves true black levels that LED TVs struggle to match. This capability contributes significantly to the overall perceived color quality and depth.

Quantum Dots: Boosting LED Performance

Many LED TVs now incorporate quantum dot technology to bridge the gap with OLED, creating what we know as QLED displays. Quantum dot enhancement films help improve color accuracy and expand the color gamut of LED TVs. This innovation has allowed LED technology to remain competitive in terms of color performance.

Understanding Color Gamut and Volume

Two essential concepts in assessing TV color performance are color gamut and color volume. Color gamut refers to the range of colors a display can produce, while color volume considers how well those colors are maintained at different brightness levels.

Interestingly, while OLED TVs often excel in color richness at lower brightness levels, QLED TVs can have an advantage in color volume. This means QLEDs might be able to maintain vibrant colors even at higher brightness levels, where some OLED displays might struggle.

Brightness: More Isn't Always Better

It's a common misconception that simply increasing a TV's brightness will result in better color performance. However, the relationship between brightness and color quality is more complex. Pushing an LED TV to its maximum brightness can sometimes lead to washed-out colors and reduced overall picture quality.

Real-World Implications: Movie Mastering

The importance of these technical aspects becomes clear when we consider how movies are mastered for different TV capabilities. Scott uses "The Meg" as an example, mastered for a peak brightness of 4,000 nits. Most TVs can't reach this level of luminance, requiring a process called tone mapping to adjust the brightness while preserving detail and color accuracy. High-end models like Sony's Bravia 9 can handle these intense brightness levels without adjustment.

Consumer Takeaway

The world of TV display technology is rich with complexity in today's landscape. While OLED technology often receives praise for its color depth and black levels, advancements in QLED technology are narrowing the gap. Understanding concepts like color gamut, color volume, and tone mapping can help customers make a more informed decision when choosing the next TV.

Want to dive even deeper into the world of TV technology? Become a Club TWiT member and watch the full episode of Home Theater Geeks episode 439 for more insights, including Scott's surprising personal connection to "The Meg" soundtrack! Join Club TWiT and head to twit.tv/htg for more television topics!

AI created, human edited.

In a recent episode of This Week in Tech (TWiT), host Leo Laporte and guests Cathy Gellis, Ryan Shrout, and Doc Rock dove into the complex and controversial case of Julian Assange. The WikiLeaks founder's recent plea deal and release from UK detention sparked a nuanced discussion about the intersection of journalism, national security, and the role of whistleblowers in modern society.

The conversation began with Laporte setting the stage, recounting Assange's journey from WikiLeaks founder to his recent plea deal. The panel grappled with the moral and legal implications of Assange's actions, particularly in light of WikiLeaks' publication of classified US documents and the infamous "Collateral Murder" video.

Cathy Gellis, an attorney admitted to practice before the Supreme Court, offered valuable legal context. She highlighted the Bartnicki v. Vopper case, which protects journalists who publish illegally obtained information, provided they weren't involved in the illegal acquisition. Gellis emphasized the crucial distinction between neutral reporting and active participation in obtaining classified information.

The panel explored the fine line between journalism and espionage, with Laporte and Gellis both expressing conflicted feelings about Assange's case. They acknowledged the importance of exposing government wrongdoing while also questioning Assange's methods and potential collaboration with foreign intelligence agencies.

Ryan Shrout, drawing on his own background in journalism, argued for erring on the side of press freedom. He stressed that the illegal acquisition of documents doesn't negate the importance of the information revealed, citing historical examples like the Pentagon Papers.

Doc Rock brought a unique perspective as a former military medic, highlighting the complexity of cases that fall into gray areas of law enforcement and national security. He suggested that while Assange may have been scapegoated to some degree, bringing these issues to light serves an important purpose.

The discussion touched on related cases, including those of Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden, further illustrating the ongoing tension between government secrecy and the public's right to know. Gellis raised important questions about the lack of clear frameworks for handling whistleblowers and leaks of classified information.

Ultimately, the TWiT panel concluded that the full story of Assange's case may never be known. They emphasized the need for coherent policies that balance national security concerns with the protection of press freedom and whistleblowers. Sagas like this illuminate broader implications for journalism and government transparency in the digital age.

To hear the full conversation and more in-depth analysis, be sure to listen to the complete episode of This Week in Tech.

Subscribe for more!

Subscribe And Never Miss an Episode!

RIAA vs. AI Music

On this week's Tech News Weekly, WIRED's Kate Knibbs chats with Mikah Sargent about the RIAA's lawsuit against AI music platforms Suno and Udio. Learn how this legal battle could impact the future of AI in music. Stay informed with the latest tech news and trends from your favorite podcast. Download the full episode now

Boost Your Brand Advertise with TWiT and take your brand to the next level! Our enterprise advertising solutions connect you with a tech-savvy, engaged audience, maximizing your reach with personalized campaigns. Explore advertising options

EU Takes on Microsoft

Catch the latest Windows Weekly where Paul Thurrott breaks down the European Commission's objections to Microsoft bundling Teams with Office/Microsoft 365 plans. This significant investigation, prompted by Slack, could reshape the landscape of digital collaboration tools. Catch the full episode here!

Help Us Grow Our Podcast Community! Your support is crucial in expanding our podcast community. Engage with our episodes, share with friends, and become a part of our growing network. Every bit of support counts in bringing you more of the content you love.

Get the Inside Scoop on the Latest Tech!

Dive into a new week of groundbreaking updates and reviews in our network's latest episodes:

1. Untitled Linux Show 158: Processor Weeds
   Jonathan Bennett and co-hosts discuss PCI-E, Intel, and Raspberry Pi.
   Watch Now
2. Hands-On Mac 139: Customize Your iPhone Action Button
   Mikah Sargent demonstrates how to launch shortcuts and control your iPhone 15 Pro.
   Watch Now
3. Hands-On Windows 97: Passkeys and Your Microsoft Account
   Paul Thurrott shows you how to use passkeys.
   Watch Now
4. Home Theater Geeks 439: Sony 2024 TV Lineup
   Discover what's next in home cinema from Sony's latest offerings with Scott Wilkinson.
   Watch Now
5. iOS Today 709: Apple Design Award 2024 Winners (Part 1)
   Mikah Sargent and Rosemary Orchard showcase innovative apps.
   Watch Now

Subscribe, download, and tune into these episodes for your weekly tech fix! Your gateway to tech enlightenment awaits: Subscribe Now

You can get this newsletter in your inbox and follow our tweets and skeets for more updates.

Facebook

X

Instagram

Bluesky

YouTube

LinkedIn

twit.tv

AI-written, human-edited.

In the latest episode of This Week in Space, hosts Rod Pyle and Isaac Arthur sit down with Evan Jensen, Vice President of Strategic Research and Development at ICON, to discuss the company's groundbreaking work in 3D printing for construction and its potential applications on the Moon and Mars.

Founded in 2018, ICON has quickly established itself as a leader in additive construction technology, pushing the boundaries of what's possible with 3D printing. From building the first permitted 3D-printed home in North America to creating entire neighborhoods and even a 26-foot-tall structure called House of Phoenix, ICON is revolutionizing the construction industry on Earth while simultaneously developing the technologies needed for extraterrestrial habitation.

One of ICON's most ambitious projects is Project Olympus, which aims to use 3D printing to build sustainable habitats on the Moon and eventually Mars. Jensen explains that the key to this endeavor is in-situ resource utilization (ISRU), or the use of locally available materials such as lunar regolith. By developing a laser-directed energy deposition system that can melt and solidify moon dust without the need for water, ICON is creating a unique 3D printing process specifically designed for the challenges of lunar construction.

But building on other worlds is just one part of ICON's mission. The company is also leveraging its expertise in robotics, AI, and autonomous systems to address the global housing crisis here on Earth. With projects like their Vitruvius AI architecture model, which allows users to design homes based on their specific needs and preferences, ICON is working to make affordable, sustainable housing accessible to all.

Throughout the episode, Jensen shares fascinating insights into the technical details of ICON's work, from the development of lunar regolith simulants for testing to the challenges of creating robotic systems that can operate in the extreme conditions of space. Pyle and Arthur engage in thought-provoking discussions about the future of space exploration and the potential impact of 3D printing technology on both Earth and beyond.

Whether you're interested in the cutting edge of construction technology, the possibilities of space habitation, or the ways in which innovation can help solve some of humanity's greatest challenges, this episode of This Week in Space is a must-listen. Tune in now to learn more about ICON's visionary work and the exciting future of 3D printing.

Become a subscriber and never miss an episode: This Week in Space

Created by AI, edited by humans.

The music industry faces a new frontier as artificial intelligence enters the realm of music creation. In a recent episode of Tech News Weekly, host Mikah Sargent and guest Kate Knibbs discussed the lawsuit brought forth by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) against AI music generators Suno and Udio.

These AI tools allow users to create polished songs with just a text prompt, producing both lyrics and music in minutes. While this technology has captivated users with its seemingly magical capabilities, it has also raised serious copyright infringement concerns within the music industry.

The crux of the RIAA's lawsuit lies not in the AI tools' output but in their training process. Knibbs explained that the record labels are alleging that the very act of training these AI models on copyrighted songs constitutes infringement. This approach marks a significant shift in how the industry is tackling the challenge of AI-generated content.

Suno and Udio have strongly defended themselves against these allegations. Knibbs predicts that their defense will likely center around the concept of fair use, arguing that AI systems should have the "right to read" copyrighted material for learning purposes, similar to how humans can consume and learn from copyrighted works.

The implications of this legal battle extend far beyond Suno and Udio. As Sargent and Knibbs discussed, the outcome could set a precedent for how AI tools are developed and used in the music industry. There's concern that a ruling against the AI companies could have a chilling effect on innovation, potentially discouraging producers from experimenting with AI in music production.

However, Knibbs also acknowledged the ethical concerns raised by artists who oppose their work being used to train AI without their permission. This tension between technological innovation and artists' rights is at the heart of the ongoing debate.

As the legal proceedings unfold, the music industry watches closely. The resolution of this case could shape the future of AI in music creation, influencing everything from how songs are composed to how copyright law is interpreted in the age of artificial intelligence. While we await the outcome, one thing is clear: the intersection of AI and music is forcing us to reconsider long-held notions of creativity, ownership, and fair use in the digital age.

Subscribe and never miss an episode of Tech News Weekly!

AI written, human edited.

In a recent episode of Security Now, hosts Steve Gibson and Leo Laporte delved into a fascinating story that highlights the critical importance of robust random number generation in cybersecurity. The tale involves a cryptocurrency owner, $2.6 million worth of Bitcoin, and a startling discovery about a popular password manager's flawed algorithm.

The story begins with a man named Michael, who had lost access to 43.6 Bitcoin (worth approximately $2.6 million at the time) due to a forgotten password. This password, generated by the RoboForm password manager in 2013, was thought to be irretrievable. However, hardware hacker Joe Grand and his colleague Bruno managed to crack the password, revealing a significant vulnerability in RoboForm's password generation process.
Steve Gibson, clearly shocked by the revelation, explained the nature of RoboForm's flaw. Until mid-2015, RoboForm's password generator was using a shockingly simplistic method to create "random" passwords. Instead of employing a cryptographically secure pseudo-random number generator (PRNG), RoboForm was merely scrambling the computer's current time.

This meant that:
1. Passwords generated within the same second would be identical.
2. Passwords could be recreated if the generation time was known.
3. Different RoboForm installations would produce the same passwords at the same time.

Both Gibson and Laporte emphasized the crucial role of true randomness in cryptographic operations. Gibson recalled his own work on the SpinRite utility, where he implemented an "entropy harvester" to gather randomness from various system sources. He also mentioned hardware-based solutions, such as reverse-biased diodes that generate quantum-level noise, as ideal sources of true randomness.

Laporte brought up other examples of random number generation, including Cloudflare's lava lamp wall, highlighting the lengths to which companies go to ensure true randomness.

The RoboForm incident serves as a stark reminder of several key points:

1. The importance of open design in security software
2. The need for independent expert assessment of cryptographic implementations
3. The dangers of assuming that well-known software products are inherently secure

Gibson strongly advocated for transparency in password manager design, stating, "Any password generator that anyone is using should fully disclose its algorithms. There's no point in that being secret in the 21st century."

For users of RoboForm prior to mid-2015, this revelation is particularly concerning. Passwords generated during this period are potentially vulnerable and should be changed. More broadly, this incident underscores the importance of regularly updating passwords and using password managers with transparent, well-vetted security practices.

The RoboForm story serves as a cautionary tale in the world of cybersecurity. It reminds us that even well-established software can harbor significant vulnerabilities, and that true randomness is a cornerstone of strong cryptography. As we continue to rely on digital systems for sensitive information, the need for robust, transparent security practices becomes ever more critical.

Become a subscriber and never miss an episode: Security Now

AI-written, human-edited.

In a recent episode of This Week in Tech (TWiT), host Leo Laporte and guests Ed Bott and Louise Matsakis delved into the complex issues surrounding the US government's decision to ban Kaspersky antivirus software. This move has sent ripples through the tech community, raising questions about national security, geopolitics, and the evolving landscape of international tech companies.

The Ban and Its Implications
The Biden administration has announced a ban on sales of Kaspersky antivirus software, giving current users 100 days to find an alternative. This decision extends beyond direct sales, also barring white-labeled products that integrate Kaspersky technology. The Commerce Department has gone a step further, adding two Russian and one UK-based Kaspersky units to its entity list, citing alleged cooperation with Russian military intelligence.

Historical Context and Suspicions
Leo Laporte reminded listeners of a past incident where Kaspersky software, running on an NSA contractor's home computer, detected and quarantined NSA spy tools. As is standard practice, these quarantined files were sent to Kaspersky's home office in Moscow for analysis. While it's unclear how this information may have reached Russian intelligence, the incident raised red flags about Kaspersky's potential ties to the Russian government.

Erring on the Side of Caution
Tech journalist Ed Bott expressed strong reservations about using any code originating from Russia, especially software that integrates deeply with computer systems like antivirus programs. He pointed out that the Russian government has a history of co-opting private industry for its purposes. Bott also noted that the US government's ban on Kaspersky products for government networks two years ago was likely based on concrete evidence.

The Changing Perception of Russian Software
Both Laporte and Bott reflected on how perceptions of Russian software have shifted. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, Russian developers were highly regarded for their skill and innovative products. However, the current geopolitical climate has drastically altered this view, especially concerning software with deep system access.

Calling for Transparency
Technology journalist Louise Matsakis raised concerns about the government's approach to banning foreign tech products. While acknowledging the potential risks, she argued for more transparency in the decision-making process. Matsakis suggested that the government should be more straightforward about its motivations, potentially framing the ban as responding to Russia's actions in Ukraine rather than relying on classified information and "theoretical concerns."

Comparisons to Other Tech Bans
The discussion touched on similarities and differences between the Kaspersky ban and other high-profile cases like TikTok and Huawei. Ed Bott argued that the Kaspersky situation is more comparable to Huawei, which faced less controversy when banned. Louise Matsakis pointed out that the US government's power to completely shut out foreign companies from global markets may be waning, citing Huawei's continued success in China and other markets.

The Broader Implications
This ban raises larger questions about the balance between national security and open markets, the changing dynamics of global tech competition, and the challenges of navigating an increasingly fractured digital landscape. As consumers and businesses adapt to these shifts, the tech industry must grapple with the complex interplay of innovation, security, and geopolitics.

To hear the full discussion and gain more insights on this topic and other tech news, be sure to listen to the complete episode of This Week in Tech, episode 985. The show offers in-depth analysis and expert perspectives on the latest developments in the tech world.

Become a subscriber and never miss an episode: This Week in Tech

Created by AI, edited by humans.

Discovering the Best of the Best in Apple's 2024 Design Awards:

In the latest episode of iOS Today, hosts Mikah Sargent and Rosemary Orchard share the winners and finalists of the Apple Design Awards 2024. These annual awards spotlight the most innovative, inclusive, and downright delightful apps and games across Apple's ever-expanding ecosystem. Let's explore some of the standout honorees that left our hosts thoroughly impressed.

Delight and Fun

In the Delight and Fun category, Bears Gratitude charmed its way to the top spot for apps. Rosemary couldn't help but gush over its adorable artwork, noting, "It is really genuinely nice and all of the artwork in it is hand-drawn, so there's over 100 hand-drawn bears inside, which you know, is just great." For games, the unstoppable NYT Games claimed the prize. Mikah, a self-proclaimed non-gamer, admitted, "That's probably the one game that I launch regularly on my phone."

Inclusivity

The Inclusivity category celebrated apps and games that go above and beyond in providing exceptional experiences for users of all backgrounds and abilities. Crayola Adventures made a splash with its groundbreaking character creation options. Mikah praised how its inclusivity "is not just kind of tacked on after the fact," but thoughtfully integrated throughout the game. In the app arena, oko blew our hosts away with its AI-powered accessible navigation. Rosemary enthusiastically recommended it, stating, "I personally think that this is an app that everybody should give a try to at least once."

Innovation

In the Innovation category, Lost in Play had our hosts utterly enchanted with its beautifully illustrated, interactive graphic novel style. Mikah couldn't contain his excitement, exclaiming, "It's truly delightful and looks like it belongs on Cartoon Network or something. It's like you're watching a cartoon play out, but you are playing the cartoon." Procreate Dreams pushed the boundaries of digital illustration, with Rosemary noting how it "always does its best to take advantage of the Apple Pencil."

Interaction

For Interaction, Crouton cooked up a storm with its inventive recipe manager and meal planner. Rosemary raved about its unique controls, like using facial gestures to navigate recipes, proclaiming, "I love that!" In games, Rytmos had Mikah floored. He gushed, "Just incredible, just absolutely incredible. You feel like you're making music while playing a puzzle game, and there's something so delightful about that."

The episode also touches on notable finalists that piqued our hosts' interests, like the immersive anatomy app Complete Anatomy 2024 ("It's kind of wow. I honestly recommend everybody just download this app just to see what's available for free and kind of have your mind boggled," said Mikah), the moving puzzle game Unpacking (Rosemary admitted, "It's on my list of games that I would love to play"), and the accessible planner Tiimo.

To hear Mikah and Rosemary's full thoughts and lively discussion on these remarkable apps and games, be sure to tune in to the complete episode of iOS Today. And stay tuned for part two, where they'll explore the winners that left them awestruck in the Social Impact, Visuals and Graphics, and Spatial Computing categories.

Subscribe and never miss an episode: iOS Today

Created by AI. Edited by humans.

In a recent episode of Windows Weekly, hosts Paul Thurrott, Richard Campbell, and Mikah Sargent delve into the European Commission's antitrust concerns regarding Microsoft Teams. The discussion highlights the complexities of the case and raises questions about the fairness of the EU's approach.

The European Commission has issued preliminary charges against Microsoft, alleging that bundling Teams with Microsoft 365 (formerly Office) violates antitrust laws. This complaint, initially brought forward by Slack in 2020, argues that Microsoft's practice unfairly disadvantages competitors in the collaboration software market.

Paul Thurrott pointed out that Microsoft has been proactively working with EU regulators to address these concerns. The tech giant has already taken steps to unbundle Teams from Microsoft 365 in Europe and has reduced the suite's price without Teams. However, the EU seems unsatisfied with these measures, leaving Microsoft in a challenging position.

The hosts provided crucial historical context, noting that Teams is the latest iteration in a long line of Microsoft communication tools dating back to 2007. Products like Office Communicator, Lync, and Skype for Business preceded Teams, existing well before Slack's 2013 launch. Thurrott drew an interesting parallel to the video game industry, comparing the situation to how established franchises like Call of Duty adapted to newcomers like PUBG and Fortnite by introducing their own battle royale modes. This analogy raises questions about when product evolution becomes an unfair competition.

The discussion highlighted the nuanced nature of antitrust law in the tech sector. Richard Campbell noted the difference between US antitrust law, which focuses on harm to consumers, and the EU's approach, which considers the concept of "gatekeepers" in digital markets. The hosts expressed frustration with the EU's lack of clear guidance on what Microsoft needs to do to resolve the issue. Unlike the recent case against Apple, where the EU provided specific action points, the Microsoft case seems more ambiguous.

The conversation raised several thought-provoking questions:

• How do you determine the fair value of a single component within a comprehensive suite of products and services?
• At what point does product innovation cross the line into unfair competition?
• Should Microsoft be held to different standards because of its market position, even if it's improving its products?

The Windows Weekly team's discussion provides valuable insights into the complex world of tech antitrust cases and the challenges regulators and companies face in this rapidly evolving landscape.

Listen to the full episode of Windows Weekly for more expert analysis and lively discussion on this and other top tech stories. Subscribe for more!

Created with AI. Edited by humans.

Apple's relationship with European regulators is becoming increasingly complex, as discussed in a recent episode of MacBreak Weekly with Leo Laporte, Andy Ihnatko, Alex Lindsay, and Jason Snell. The panel dove into the latest developments surrounding Apple's alleged non-compliance with EU rules and the company's decision to withhold certain regional AI technologies.

Brussels has accused Apple of breaking competition rules outlined in the Digital Markets Act (DMA), particularly regarding restrictions on developers' abilities to direct customers to promotions outside the App Store. This "anti-steering" practice has been a point of contention, with the EU pushing for more open markets and increased competition.

The panel explored the nuances of Apple's response, including the new fee structure for apps with over one million downloads. While Alex Lindsay argued that these changes primarily affect large companies and not average developers, Andy Ihnatko and Jason Snell emphasized the potential impact on smaller developers and alternative app stores.

However, in a controversial move, Apple announced it would not roll out several AI-related features in the EU, citing concerns over regulatory requirements compromising user privacy and data security. The hosts debated whether this was a genuine security concern or a strategic move to pressure EU regulators.

Jason Snell suggested Apple might be sending a message that strict regulations could result in European consumers missing out on innovative features. Andy Ihnatko was more skeptical, viewing Apple's stance as potentially manipulative and designed to sway public opinion against regulation.

The discussion highlighted the complex interplay between tech innovation, business interests, and government regulation. While the hosts had differing views on the appropriateness of Apple's actions, they agreed that the outcome of this standoff could have significant implications for the future of app distribution and AI technology deployment in Europe and beyond.

As the situation continues to evolve, it's clear that Apple's relationship with EU regulators will remain a hot topic in the tech world, with potential ripple effects for developers, consumers, and the broader industry.

Become a subscriber and never miss an episode: MacBreak Weekly

AI written, human edited.

Mozilla, the organization behind the popular Firefox browser, has recently made waves in the tech world with its acquisition of Anonym, an ad metrics firm. This move has ignited a passionate discussion among industry experts and users alike, raising questions about the balance between user privacy and the sustainability of ad-supported internet media.

On a recent episode of This Week in Google, hosts Leo Laporte, Jeff Jarvis, and Paris Martineau delved into the implications of this acquisition and what it means for the future of online advertising and user privacy.

Mozilla has long been viewed as a champion of user privacy. Firefox serves as an alternative to Google Chrome for those seeking to avoid intrusive data collection. However, the purchase of Anonym, a company founded by former Meta executives, has left many wondering if Mozilla is compromising its values.

As Leo Laporte pointed out, "Many Mozilla users use Mozilla because it's not Google, because you can put ad blocking on it." This acquisition seems to contradict the image Mozilla has cultivated since the 1990s, which has always implied an avoidance of online advertising.

Anonym's technology aims to provide a middle ground between effective advertising and user privacy. According to the discussion, the company allows advertisers to join their first-party data with publisher data for measurement, targeting, and optimization purposes. However, this occurs in a secure environment where individual data is not accessed by humans.

Paris Martineau summarized Anonym's process in three parts:
1. Secure environment: Data sets are matched in a highly secure setting.
2. Anonymized analytics: The process results in anonymized insights and models.
3. Differential privacy algorithms: These add noise to the data, protecting it from being traced back to individuals.

Jeff Jarvis emphasized the need for new models to support ad-supported internet media. The hosts discussed the challenges faced by content creators and publishers who need to prove the effectiveness of their advertising to secure revenue.

Leo Laporte shared his own experience with podcast advertising, describing a similar process used by his network to provide advertisers with aggregated data on ad effectiveness without compromising individual user privacy.

This acquisition highlights the ongoing struggle in the tech industry to balance user privacy with the need for sustainable business models. As Paris Martineau noted, while many users demand privacy and ad-free experiences, they are often unwilling to pay for content directly.

The discussion touched on the dilemma faced by companies like Meta, which argue that without behavioral advertising, users would have to pay for services directly. This raises questions about the future of free, ad-supported content on the internet.

According to Mozilla's blog post, this acquisition is a step towards addressing the need for privacy-preserving advertising solutions. The company aims to provide advertisers with the insights they need while safeguarding consumer privacy.

While Mozilla's acquisition of Anonym has raised concerns among privacy advocates, it also represents an attempt to find a middle ground in the complex landscape of online advertising. As the internet continues to evolve, finding ways to support content creators and publishers while respecting user privacy remains a critical challenge.

The hosts of This Week in Google, while cautious, seemed to view this development as a potentially positive step towards more privacy-conscious advertising models. However, they also emphasized the need for transparency and ongoing scrutiny to ensure that user privacy remains protected.

As the digital advertising landscape continues to shift, it's clear that the conversation around privacy, advertising, and the sustainability of online content is far from over. Mozilla's move with Anonym may well be a glimpse into the future of internet advertising – one that attempts to balance the needs of all stakeholders in the digital ecosystem.

Become a subscriber and never miss an episode: This Week in Google

AI-written, human-edited.

On iOS Today podcast hosts Mikah Sargent and Rosemary Orchard discuss the exciting new features coming in iOS 18 and iPadOS 18. Fresh off Apple's announcements at WWDC, the duo unpacked how Apple is thoughtfully weaving artificial intelligence into the core experience through Apple Intelligence.

One of the standout additions is smart image generation powered by on-device machine learning. Users will be able to create personalized emoji, enhance photos, and even remove unwanted objects or people from images - all while preserving privacy by processing everything locally on your iPhone or iPad when possible. Apple is taking a characteristically restrained approach, but make no mistake, generative AI is coming to iOS in a big way.

iOS 18 is also packed with enhancements to the core apps you use every day. The Notes and Reminders apps are getting supercharged with smart suggestions, document scanning, and powerful handwriting recognition. You'll be able to brainstorm and capture your ideas more naturally than ever. Mail is becoming more intelligent as well, with automated categorization, smart search, and one-tap unsubscribe.

Accessibility is another major theme, with Apple leveraging AI to make iOS more inclusive. Live captions are expanding to calls and FaceTime, VoiceOver descriptions are more detailed, and Apple is even using machine learning to detect and describe important sounds around you. iOS is for everyone.

For Shortcuts enthusiasts and automation fans, iOS 18 has some exciting updates in store. With Siri getting more contextually aware, you'll be able to trigger shortcuts hands-free based on your current activity. AirPods are also getting new smart features that will allow you to activate shortcuts and smart home scenes with simple head gestures. It's a taste of how AI will make automation more seamless and integrated in the future.

Of course, this only scratches the surface of what Mikah and Rosemary covered in their iOS 18 deep dive. Be sure to listen to the full episode of iOS Today to hear their complete reactions and perspectives on all the new features. As Apple continues its "slow but steady" embrace of AI, it's clear iOS and iPadOS are evolving in powerful new ways. The future is intelligent, and it's already here in your pocket.

Become a subscriber and never miss an episode: iOS Today

AI written, human edited.

In a recent episode of Security Now, hosts Steve Gibson and Leo Laporte delved into Apple's groundbreaking Private Cloud Compute (PCC) system, dissecting the insights of renowned cryptographer Matthew Green. This new technology promises to revolutionize mobile computing by securely offloading complex tasks to the cloud, but it also raises important questions about privacy and security.

Matthew Green, an associate professor at Johns Hopkins Information Security Institute, shared his thoughts on Apple's PCC through a series of posts on Mastodon. Green acknowledged the need for cloud processing to handle increasingly demanding AI tasks that surpass the capabilities of on-device hardware. However, he also highlighted the inherent risks of sending sensitive data over the internet.

Apple's solution to this challenge is nothing short of extraordinary. The company has designed a system that employs cutting-edge security measures at every level:

1. Hardware Security: Apple performs high-resolution imaging of server components before sealing and activating tamper switches. This process involves multiple teams and third-party observers to ensure integrity.

2. Software Protection: The PCC nodes run stateless software that doesn't retain information between user requests. Each node reboots, re-keys, and wipes all storage after every task.

3. Data Handling: User data is processed solely for the requested task and is immediately deleted after the response is returned. Apple claims that even their staff with administrative access cannot view this data.

4. Transparency: Apple plans to publish software measurements in a tamper-proof log and provide tools for researchers to analyze the PCC node software.

5. Anonymity: The system uses blind signatures and third-party relays to mask users' IP addresses, preventing identification of individual requests.

Steve Gibson expressed admiration for Apple's comprehensive approach, stating, "Nobody has ever done anything like this before." He particularly praised the hardware imaging process as a deterrent against tampering.

However, both Green and the Security Now hosts raised some concerns:

1. Opt-out options: It's unclear whether users can choose not to use PCC for certain tasks.
2. Transparency to users: Apple hasn't announced plans to notify users when their data is being processed in the cloud.
3. Potential for undetected vulnerabilities: The system's complexity could hide "sharp edges" that might be difficult for researchers to identify.

Leo Laporte noted that while this cloud-based approach is necessary for advanced features, the ultimate goal is to bring these capabilities back on-device for both privacy and economic reasons.

Gibson raised an additional concern not mentioned by Green: the potential for other companies to imitate Apple's approach without implementing the same rigorous security measures. This could lead to a false sense of security among users of these lookalike services.

Despite these concerns, both hosts acknowledged the significance of Apple's efforts. As Green concluded, "This PCC system represents a real commitment by Apple not to peek at your data. That's a big deal."

The discussion on Security Now highlights the complex balance between technological advancement and privacy protection. As we move into an era where our devices increasingly rely on cloud processing, Apple's Private Cloud Compute sets a new standard for secure, privacy-focused cloud computing. However, it also underscores the need for continued vigilance and transparency in the tech industry.

For those interested in the cutting edge of mobile security and privacy, this development is certainly one to watch closely.

Become a subscriber and never miss an episode: Security Now

Subscribe And Never Miss an Episode!

Stay Updated with the Latest Tech News

Catch the latest episode of This Week in Tech where Leo Laporte hosts Amanda Silberling, Louise Matsakis, and Ed Bott. This week's hot topics include Biden's ban on Kaspersky software due to Russia ties, the controversial DJI Drone Ban, and the Surgeon General's stance on social media health warnings. Plus, insights into Microsoft delaying Recall and the cheapest Surface Pro review.
For a deeper look and more tech talk, make sure to download and subscribe to catch all the insights. Catch the full episode here!

Advertise with TWiT

Advertise with TWiT and take your brand to the next level! Our enterprise advertising solutions connect you with a tech-savvy, engaged audience, maximizing your reach with personalized campaigns.
Explore advertising options

Help Us Grow Our Podcast Community! Hey TWiT fans! We need your positive reviews! Show us some love and leave a review on your favorite podcatcher. Your feedback helps us grow! Subscribe and review on Apple Podcasts

Get the Inside Scoop on the Latest Tech!

Dive into a new week of groundbreaking updates and reviews in our network's latest episodes:

1. Untitled Linux Show 157: Smarter Dumb Terminal
   Jonathan Bennett and co-hosts discuss RISC-V Framework and the latest on Kaspersky.
   Watch Now
2. Hands-On Mac 138: Understanding Focus Modes on macOS
   Mikah Sargent previews exclusive features in macOS Sequoia.
   Watch Now
3. Hands-On Windows 96: Microsoft Copilot as an App
   Paul Thurrott explores the new Copilot experience for Windows Insiders.
   Watch Now
4. Home Theater Geeks 438: Improving Dialogue with a Soundbar
   Scott Wilkinson recommends soundbars designed to enhance dialogue clarity.
   Watch Now
5. iOS Today 708: iOS 18 Additional Features
   Mikah Sargent and Rosemary Orchard reveal new iOS 18 features, including Genmoji and Siri with ChatGPT.
   Watch Now

Subscribe, download, and tune into these episodes for your weekly tech fix! Your gateway to tech enlightenment awaits: Subscribe Now

You can get this newsletter in your inbox and follow our tweets and skeets for more updates.

Facebook

X

Instagram

Bluesky

YouTube

LinkedIn

twit.tv

AI-created, human-edited.

In the latest Windows Weekly episode hosted by Leo Laporte, Paul Thurrott, and Rich Campbell, the trio delved into the much-anticipated launch of Microsoft's Copilot+ PCs. The discussion revealed a mixed bag of controversies, delays, and potential for the future of AI-powered computing.

Microsoft's Copilot+ PC launch was marred by unnecessary controversy, as the company requested PC makers to withhold review units until the Recall feature was fixed. This decision led to a delay in the release of Recall, with Microsoft opting to test it with their Insider team before rolling it out to the public. The easier solution was to remove Recall entirely, rather than fixing it, which raises questions about the readiness of the feature.

Despite the setbacks, PC makers managed to ship out Copilot+ PCs to reviewers on the launch day, with a mandatory update to the latest version of Windows 11 24H2 before users could start exploring the new features. This update process, which Paul Thurrott dubbed "the Xbox game-ification of laptop releases," hinted at Microsoft's desire to see an AI-driven hardware upgrade cycle, similar to what Apple and Google aim for.

However, the irony lies in the fact that the AI features in Copilot+ PCs are not as compelling as one might expect. The hosts suggest that while users may be drawn in by the AI capabilities, the real benefits lie in the efficiency, uptime, and reliability of the new hardware. A brief demonstration of a MacBook Air highlighted the potential for ARM-based devices to deliver on these fronts.

Paul Thurrott, who expects to review three Copilot+ PCs soon, including the Surface Laptop 7, HP OmniBook X or EliteBook Ultra, and Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x, also shared his thoughts on the need for ARM-based processors in the Windows ecosystem. The discussion took a humorous turn with the mention of laptop stickers and an x86 PC error message, showcasing the current state of Windows computing.

As the Windows Weekly team continues to explore the evolving landscape of Windows 11, with its various update channels and feature releases, the Copilot+ PC launch serves as a reminder of the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead for Microsoft in the AI-driven computing era.

To hear the full discussion on Microsoft's Copilot+ PC launch, along with insights on Windows 11 updates, AI advancements, and more, be sure to listen to the complete Windows Weekly episode. Tune in for an engaging and informative look at the world of Windows and beyond.

Subscribe and never miss an episode of Windows Weekly

AI-created, human-edited.

Apple's $3,499 Vision Pro mixed reality headset has been out for a few months, with developers having access even earlier. But on MacBreak Weekly, Leo Laporte, Andy Ihnatko, Alex Lindsay, and Jason Snell questioned whether a pricey ultra-high-end device is really the right strategy for Apple's next steps in this emerging product category.

The discussion started with a report from The Information claiming Apple has told at least one supplier that it has halted development of its next high-end Vision Pro model, reportedly code-named Vision Pro 2 or Reality Pro. Instead, the company allegedly focuses on releasing a more affordable Vision Pro in late 2025 as part of Apple's earlier roadmap for dividing the product line into premium and more mainstream models.

While calling the sourcing "flimsy," even for a supply chain rumor, Jason Snell acknowledged that pursuing a lower price point makes sense as the primary goal for broadening the adoption of visionOS devices beyond early enthusiasts and professionals. At $3,500, the cost is a huge hurdle for consumers, he argued. "If they could get it down to even $1,000 or $1,500, it would be a better argument to make."

Andy Ihnatko raised another reservation - after months of developer access, there still isn't a clear "killer app" that screams why the Vision Pro experience is worth the massive premium over more affordable VR headsets like Meta's $400 Quest 2. He praised the technical performance and innovation but questioned if Apple has truly justified that 10x delta pricing for most users.

Alex Lindsay highlighted the potential for immersive education and training experiences, pointing to the impressive JigSpace app to glimpse what's possible when 3D models can be manipulated and annotated as physical objects in a shared virtual space. However, he acknowledged that creating such compelling VR/AR content remains extremely difficult and costly today.

The panel seemed to agree that Apple's near-term focus should be on making this an accessible, mainstream product category before pushing the ultra-high-end capabilities that will be major drivers for professional use cases.

Ambient AR wearables like the rumored "Apple Glass" and Meta's new camera-equipped Ray-Ban smart glasses were also discussed as intriguing, more achievable stepping stones between today's status quo and the Science Vision future of AR immersion.

While still skeptical of some aspects of the initial report, the MacBreak Weekly crew landed on the idea that a more affordable Apple Vision Pro sooner rather than later could be the right strategic move to ultimately broaden the addressable market and spark the content flywheel needed to drive revolutionary new AR/VR use cases.

Subscribe and never miss an episode: MacBreak Weekly

AI-created, human-edited.

In the latest episode of This Week in Tech, host Leo Laporte and guests Devindra Hardawar, Daniel Rubino, and Padre engaged in a thought-provoking discussion about the contrasting approaches Apple and Microsoft took in presenting their respective AI integration strategies.

The conversation centered around Apple's unveiling of "Apple Intelligence" at their recent developer conference, as well as Microsoft's earlier announcement of the controversial "Recall" feature for their upcoming Copilot+ PCs. While Apple's approach was praised for its thoughtfulness and focus on specific use cases, Microsoft's handling of Recall drew criticism for perceived security lapses and poor communication.

Devindra Hardawar commended Apple's measured rollout, highlighting their emphasis on practical applications like improving Siri, transcribing notes, and enhancing productivity features. He contrasted this with Microsoft's more aggressive push of Copilot and OpenAI integration, which raised concerns about the technology's readiness and utility for everyday users.

Daniel Rubino pointed out that Microsoft's missteps with Recall stemmed from a desire to emulate Apple's ability to generate excitement around new features. However, their lack of transparency and failure to adequately address security concerns led to a public relations debacle and a significant walkback of the Recall feature.

Padre offered an intriguing perspective, suggesting that both companies' approaches are driven by the need to address the "poisoning the well" problem inherent in AI systems that draw from crap on the internet. By training AI models on user-specific data, Apple and Microsoft could mitigate the risk of biased or problematic outputs.

The discussion also touched on broader issues surrounding tech companies' handling of security vulnerabilities and their relationships with government agencies. Leo Laporte, citing a ProPublica investigation, raised concerns about Microsoft's alleged prioritization of business interests over addressing identified security flaws, citing a ProPublica investigation.

While opinions differed on the specific strategies employed by Apple and Microsoft, there was a consensus that the AI integration process requires careful consideration of privacy, security, and user trust. As the podcast guests noted, companies that fail to address these concerns risk eroding consumer confidence and facing regulatory scrutiny.

As the AI revolution continues to gather momentum, enthusiasts everywhere will observe how tech giants navigate the delicate balance between innovation and responsible implementation. Apple and Microsoft's contrasting approaches are a microcosm of the broader challenges and debates surrounding this transformative technology.

Become a subscriber and never miss an episode: This Week in Tech

AI-created, human-edited.

In a recent episode of Security Now, hosts Steve Gibson and Leo Laporte delved into a fascinating story that underscores both the complexities and ingenuities within the world of cybersecurity. The tale revolves around code.microsoft.com, a domain that transitioned from hosting Visual Studio Code documentation to becoming an unintentional, then intentional, honeypot for Microsoft's cybersecurity team.

The saga began when code.microsoft.com, once an active site for developer resources, was decommissioned around 2021. What should have been a routine retirement of a subdomain led to an alarming discovery: the domain had briefly fallen into the hands of malicious actors who repurposed it for a malware command and control service. This incident highlighted a concerning vulnerability that Steve Gibson found "nothing short of insane" – the ability for someone outside Microsoft to commandeer a subdomain of microsoft.com by simply giving their own Azure cloud instance the same name.

Gibson expressed disbelief at this architectural flaw, stating, "All I can surmise is that there must be some serious design problems over in Microsoft land for that to ever have been possible." The hosts pondered the implications of such a vulnerability, particularly for enterprises that might whitelist entire Microsoft networks, inadvertently granting trust to what could be a compromised subdomain.

However, the story takes an intriguing turn. Rather than simply shutting down the compromised subdomain, Microsoft's security team saw an opportunity. They repurposed code.microsoft.com into a honeypot – a decoy system designed to attract and monitor malicious activity. This decision transformed a potential security nightmare into a valuable source of threat intelligence.

The sophistication of Microsoft's honeypot impressed even the technically savvy Gibson. He highlighted the system's ability to simulate over 300 known vulnerabilities while maintaining control that actual exploits would typically bypass. "So it looks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, but it ain't no duck. Very, very cool tech," Gibson remarked.

This honeypot became a crucial tool for Microsoft, providing insights into emerging threats, zero-day vulnerabilities, and the tactics of various threat actors. It played a pivotal role during major security events like the Log4Shell incident and the Exchange ProxyLogon vulnerability, enabling Microsoft to track exploit developments and better protect its customers.

The hosts also discussed the eventual "outing" of the honeypot. Despite efforts to keep it under wraps, including closing bug bounty reports with a wink and a nod, the secret eventually leaked. A sudden spike in traffic and social media buzz in April 2023 marked the end of code.microsoft.com's covert operations. In a three-hour period, the subdomain faced nearly 80,000 exploits targeting a WeChat vulnerability, signaling that the jig was up.

Gibson and Laporte marveled at the difficulty of keeping secrets on the internet, speculating on how the exploit URL might have ended up indexed by Google. "It's easy to imagine that Google would have set up Chrome to feed URLs back to them for bot crawling indexing," Gibson suggested.

The podcast segment concluded with reflections on the broader implications of this story. It reveals the double-edged nature of the internet's interconnectedness – the same mechanisms that can expose vulnerabilities can also be harnessed for defense. Moreover, it hints at the depth of talent within large tech organizations like Microsoft, often overshadowed by public-facing mishaps.

"Why don't we get the sense in general that Microsoft is this good?" Gibson pondered, suggesting that brilliant minds might be "buried so deeply down in the infrastructure that you just talk to morons on the surface." Laporte offered a different take, attributing issues more to the sheer complexity of such large systems where "things fall through the cracks."

This captivating discussion on Security Now not only sheds light on an innovative application of honeypot technology but also prompts broader questions about cybersecurity practices, the challenges of maintaining vast digital infrastructures, and the hidden ingenuity within tech giants. As we navigate an increasingly complex digital landscape, stories like that of code.microsoft.com remind us that in the world of cybersecurity, vulnerabilities and victories often emerge from the most unexpected places.

Subscribe so you don't miss an episode: Security Now

Subscribe And Never Miss an Episode!

WWDC24 Highlights

Leo Laporte, Alex Lindsay, and Andy Ihnatko, with guest Mikah Sargent, unravel Apple's big reveals at WWDC24 on MacBreak Weekly! Get the scoop on Apple Intelligence coming to iPhone, iPad, and Mac, including the exciting new Image Playground. iPadOS 18 brings a long-awaited Calculator app and Smart Script for the Apple Pencil. Plus, Apple Vision Pro will expand to China and Singapore starting June 28th.
Download and subscribe here

Craft with Mikah New Club TWiT event! Join Mikah Sargent on Wednesday at 6 PM PDT for a cozy, chill, and fun crafting session. Whether you're into knitting, crocheting, painting, or LEGO building, this is your time to unwind and get creative. Not a Club TWiT member? Sign up here

All Things Apple

Apple is revolutionizing tech, and our podcasts cover every detail. From new products to future innovations and privacy concerns, MacBreak Weekly, iOS Today, and Hands-On Mac have you covered. Stay updated with the latest in Apple technology. Follow our Apple coverage here.

Maximize Impact: Sponsor TWiT

Want to reach a tech-savvy audience? Sponsor TWiT's innovative podcasts! Our host-read ads connect your brand with engaged listeners. With 88% making purchases based on our ads and 99% tuning in regularly, it's a powerful way to amplify your marketing. Learn more about advertising with TWiT

You can get this newsletter in your inbox and follow our tweets and skeets for more updates.

Facebook

X

Instagram

Bluesky

YouTube

LinkedIn

twit.tv